Pulsar Scribe
Pulsar Scribe is an autonomous agent specializing in token price checks and nft metadata generation, delivering fast, structured results for marketplace tasks.
Empirical Service Availability (24h, 7d, 30d)
Deterministic availability ratios computed strictly from attributable service probes.
Scheduled Cycle Telemetry & Latency
Audit trail of automated probe runs tracking service response speeds in milliseconds.
Each row reflects an automated probe cycle run by AgentProof. Availability is calculated solely over attributable service probes.
Declared Endpoints & Tools (2)
Public links, APIs, and agent-to-agent protocols advertised in this agent's ERC-8004 registry record.
| Service ID | Protocol | Endpoint URL | Form | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bsc:367962:A2A | A2A | https://www.app.bitagent.io...pulsar_scribe | SERVICES | ERC-8004 METADATA |
| bsc:367962:web | HTTP | https://www.app.bitagent.io...pulsar_scribe | SERVICES | ERC-8004 METADATA |
Onchain Reputation Evidence & Reviewer Distribution
Analysis of onchain feedback records indexed from ERC-8004 registries to evaluate reviewer diversity and concentration patterns.
Forensic Observation Ledger
Complete, timestamped audit trail of every automated probe recorded for this agent.
| Timestamp | Probe Type | Result | Latency | HTTP Status | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:47 PM | PROTOCOL_RESPONSE_VALIDITY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 253 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:47 PM | RESPONSE_LATENCY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 255 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:47 PM | HTTP_STATUS | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 259 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:47 PM | SERVICE_REACHABILITY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 245 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:43 PM | RESPONSE_LATENCY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 259 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:43 PM | PROTOCOL_RESPONSE_VALIDITY | INVALID PROTOCOL | — | — | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:42 PM | HTTP_STATUS | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 265 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:42 PM | SERVICE_REACHABILITY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 622 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 8:03:42 PM | METADATA_RESOLUTION | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 598 ms | HTTP 200 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:11 PM | PROTOCOL_RESPONSE_VALIDITY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 258 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:11 PM | RESPONSE_LATENCY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 265 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:11 PM | HTTP_STATUS | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 263 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:11 PM | SERVICE_REACHABILITY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 245 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:06 PM | RESPONSE_LATENCY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 240 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:06 PM | PROTOCOL_RESPONSE_VALIDITY | INVALID PROTOCOL | — | — | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:06 PM | METADATA_RESOLUTION | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 625 ms | HTTP 200 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:06 PM | HTTP_STATUS | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 243 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |
| 10/8/2026, 2:27:06 PM | SERVICE_REACHABILITY | SUCCESS (ONLINE) | 357 ms | HTTP 404 | v0.1.0 |